An interesting generalization…

…and we all know that generalizations are only broad comments and therefore does not apply to everyone.

Here is the original post.

Here is my modified and reversed version.

Have you ever noticed…

• …everyone who tries to advocate an unpopular Biblical doctrine paints himself as heroic?
• …everyone who tries to advocate an unpopular Biblical doctrine paints himself as tragic?
• …everyone who tries to advocate an unpopular Biblical doctrine paints his faith as a different faith from every other faithful follower who has ever followed and come to a bad end from it?
• …everyone who tries to advocate an unpopular Biblical doctrine insists that his path won’t end up where every other follower’s path ended? Which is to say…
• …everyone who tries to advocate an unpopular Biblical doctrine hates it when the historical and logical progression of irrational belief is pointed out?
• …everyone who tries to advocate an unpopular Biblical doctrine paints himself as smarter, deeper, less lazy, and more honest than people who don’t share his faith?
• …everyone who tries to advocate an unpopular Biblical doctrine paints himself as humble, while those who point out the irrationality of the ‘Word’ are arrogant?
• …everyone who tries to advocate an unpopular Biblical doctrine paints himself as nice, while those who point out the irrationality of said doctrine are mean?
• …everyone who tries to advocate an unpopular Biblical doctrine paints himself as courageous, while those who point out the irrationalities of the ‘Word’ are bullies and ruffians?
• …everyone who tries advocate an unpopular Biblical doctrine paints himself as academically sophisticated, carefully nuanced, and wonderfully insightful, while those who point out the irrationality of the ‘Word’ are unenlightened hacks and drooling doubting troglodytes?